DPI maintains disaggregated performance data on their website. This data can help you determine specific groups that need attention.

Website: http://accrpt.ncpublicschools.org/app/2012/amo/

Which subject area was stronger? Which was weaker? Is this consistent among all subgroups or among all grade levels? What implications does this have for each of the subgroups or grade levels?

Were there any particular programs or strategies used (or not used) with those subgroups that might explain their performance?

Considering that the students have now advanced to the next grade level, what implications does each grade level’s performance have for their current teachers? What implications does it have for how the teachers in that grade level might better work with each of the subgroups?